Counting flies and typos to find ROI

Ask anyone in marketing or journalism whether spelling counts, and you’ll get a resounding yes. Typos of any kind hurt.

They signal lack of attention, they erode the consumer’s trust and they’re embarrassing. When readers have little else to judge a writer or a publication, they resort to what they do know, like spelling. It’s like people judging the frame of a house by the paint, or the mechanical condition of a car by the way it “drives.” They’re like a grocery store with flies buzzing around or a dentist who dresses like a slob.

Professionals in every line of work try like hell to avoid those flies in the air. But at some point, of course, the grocer gives up. Sometimes the flies just keep coming back and there’s nothing short of calling out the Army that can kill them all.

For typos, what is that point when you have to give up? At what cost is it no longer worth trying to prevent misspellings, malaprops, bad syntax and other gremlins of writing?

I hear consensus among those I know who use ink stains to indicate their tribe: all proofreading is well spent. Pressed further, they often resort to statements like “Well, everybody knows…” blah, blah.

Imagine the day when a CEO tells his chief marketing officer, “I know. Our catalog’s quality is crucial. Typos are poison. But it’s a tough time. We’ve got to make cuts.”

The marketing exec could lay off the one copyeditor, forcing everyone else to do more. The catalog, not to mention the ezines, web pages, printed brochures and directories, would all lose luster. It’d be like a neighborhood that had slipped.

How can the marketing exec defend that copyeditor? What is the return on a dollar spent on proofreading?

Obviously, it matters who reads it. Typos mean more to well educated older people than they do to one segment of younger people for whom spelling doesn’t seem to matter at all.

Has anyone measured the return? I would like to see any empirical guide—even a solid clue—for any market anywhere. Flies count, but how much?

Leave a reply

Other recent posts

End of one-size-fits-all data stories

This appeared originally on the TDWI site in September behind a paywall. It’s still there, but today they’ve had the 90 days of exclusive use that I agreed to. Survey after survey reveals that about 80 percent of business users don’t use data analysis—despite all the marketing and “easy to use” tools. As if in… Continue Reading

Qlik finally set to leapfrog Tableau?

Who’s your rival? I carelessly asked a Qlik person at the company’s annual analyst reception Monday night in Miami if she hadn’t once worked for Tableau. Her revulsion was immediate. “No! Never!,” she said. We smiled. There was so much more to talk about. For one thing, how will private equity change things? Qlik wasn’t… Continue Reading

Five Tips for Better Data Stories

Originally published on September 22, 2015 in BI This Week, a TDWI publication. A “data story” sounds like such a great idea. You just mix data with storytelling and you’re done — except that most data storytellers get one thing wrong: they drown out the story with data. Such storytellers, I believe, assume that audiences… Continue Reading

Bohemian Grove a la BI

The Bohemian Grove of the BI industry convenes for the fifteenth time in just three weeks. Naturally, you ask the obvious question: Are you serious? The Grove? A summit? The answer begins with a fond recollection of the Grove. If you’ve never attended the Bohemian Grove yourself — I haven’t, though I live in the… Continue Reading